|
Hey Reader, There has been a lot of activity in the nonprofit world as of late, and I thought to share a few things that have come up during blog interviews, conference sessions/conversations, and nonprofit networking events. Three things came up so consistently that I'm treating them as sector patterns, and sharing what it means if you're seeing any of this inside your own organization. PATTERN 1: Data lives in too many places, and nobody trusts any of them.The CRM has some of it. The spreadsheet has some of it. The development director's personal notes have the rest. When you ask for a current donor count, you get an answer that depends on which source the person happened to check first. The issue I see if that when data is fragmented, decisions are fragmented. Your board is making resource allocations based on data that's been filtered through six different interpretations before it reaches them. That's not a technology problem — it's a trust problem. And it compounds. Small action to address it: before you evaluate any new platform, spend one hour documenting where your data actually lives right now. Every spreadsheet, every tool, every informal tracking system. That map is worth more than any sales demo. PATTERN 2: Staff turnover is resetting organizations faster than they can build capacity.The organizations that came up most in conversation were the ones watching experienced people leave and institutional knowledge walk out the door with them. Not because they're bad employers — because the sector is under pressure and people have options. The problem isn't the turnover. It's that nothing was ever documented well enough to survive it. The trouble here is that if your most CRM-reliant staff member left next month, could the next person do their job from what's written down? If the answer is no, you have a continuity risk that no hiring budget can fix. Small action to address it: document five workflows — your five most critical ones — reduce this risk more than most organizations accomplish in a full quarter of onboarding investment. PATTERN 3: The gap between what leadership sees and what staff experiences is wider than most EDs realize.Leadership is seeing reports. Staff are living the workflows that produce those reports. And in most organizations I talked to, those two realities have drifted significantly apart. Staff have found workarounds. Leadership doesn't know about them. The reports look fine. The actual work is harder and takes way longer than it needs to be. Small action to address it: ask three staff members the same operational question this week. 'How do you enter a new donor contact?' If you get three different answers, the drift is real. That's where to start. One resource before you go: CRM Readiness ScorecardIf Pattern 1 resonated, the question worth asking is how fragmented your data actually is — not whether it feels fragmented, but where the specific gaps sit and how deep they go. If Pattern 2 hit closer to home, the real risk isn't the turnover. It's what your documentation score looks like underneath it. Most organizations losing ground to staff transitions score a 1 or 2 on documentation accessibility. That number tells you more than an exit interview will. If Pattern 3 is the one that made you pause, the gap between what leadership sees and what staff experiences shows up in a very specific place: workflow alignment. How well your CRM supports daily processes. How often automations actually get used. How adaptable the system is when something in your org changes. The CRM Readiness Scorecard measures all three. Fifteen questions across five dimensions — data integrity, staff adoption, reporting clarity, workflow alignment, and process documentation. Takes about four minutes. Based on your score, we send you a short guide specific to where you are — not generic advice, but a focused next step for your readiness level. See where your results land you! The form is hyperlinked above. If you want to talk through what you find, reply to this email. I read every one. Blessings, |
Nonprofit leaders who are tired of messy data, disconnected systems, and lack of donor and programmatic insights this newsletter is for you. Welcome to your one stop shop for all things nonprofit CRMs.
Hey Reader, This week, we are going down the rabbit hole of a recent Salesforce report. Salesforce just released their 7th annual Nonprofit Trends Report. They surveyed 1,229 nonprofits across six countries. The findings cover fundraising, AI adoption, staffing, digital channels, and program outcomes. What kept coming up was infrastructure. Orgs investing in better fundraising strategies and AI tools while the data underneath those investments isn't ready to support them. Staff leaving and...
Hey Reader, I've received some great feedback from last week's issue and I hope to continue that momentum today! Let me know what's resonating and what you would like to see in these emails. Let's get into it... The Tool-First Trap The question I get asked more than any other — at every event, every discovery call, every session I run — is this: 'Which CRM should we use?' And I understand why. The CRM is the thing you can see. It has a price tag. It feels like the decision. But in almost...
Hey Reader, It's been a while. The last time this newsletter landed in your inbox was October. That's five months. And I want to be straight with you about what happened — because "I've been busy" isn't an explanation, and you deserve better than that. Here's what actually happened. Things accelerated. A 24-month Salesforce engagement launched at a critical moment and needed full attention. A conference session got confirmed. And a set of offers I'd been designing for nonprofits that can't...